Most businesses evaluate contract repositories by how quickly they can find documents or generate simple reports. But features like these only scratch the surface — true quality runs much deeper.
To make the right choice, you need to know exactly what quality looks like in a contract repository. Here’s a comprehensive checklist to help.
For a closer look at each of these points, the second half of this article breaks each question down in more detail.
Accuracy isn’t negotiable. If your repository can’t deliver trustworthy data consistently, nothing else matters.
Every data point is important. Your repository should meticulously validate each piece of data, whilst accounting for all the possible edge cases, nuances and complexities that contracts bring. The best solutions use structured processes and human-in-the-loop review to make sure accuracy isn’t left to chance.
A reliable repository doesn’t just record what's explicitly written; it also actively confirms when expected information is legitimately missing or not included in the scope of the contract. Without proactively verifying absences, uncertainty creeps in.
Quality repositories don’t just ‘extract’ data — they capture underlying contract logic. Contracts almost always contain implicit instructions, like renewal notice periods or initial term lengths. Your repository should actively calculate these implied dates and deadlines for you, converting contract terms into actionable information without relying on manual calculations.
Contracts frequently contain unclear language, errors, or conflicting terms. There can also be important documents missing, like amendments or a set of terms and conditions. Your repository should not only identify these ambiguities, but also actively manage and resolve them.
Contract repositories should allow you to instantly trace every data point back to the exact wording in the original contract. This transparency gives you confidence in every decision you make, as well as the full context surrounding any piece of information that’s captured.
A repository is more than document storage — it’s a structured representation of how your agreements operate in practice. If it can’t accurately mirror the relationships between documents or enforce proper organisation, then the utility of the data quickly breaks down.
Consistent naming conventions across your repository prevent confusion and make it far easier to search for contracts. Good organisation starts with clear, uniform titles for every agreement.
A reliable repository understands which documents belong together, correctly organising them into their constituent agreements whilst preserving the correct order of precedence. Without this guarantee, you lose critical context and can never be certain of having the full picture.
A robust repository is able to model the complex network of relationships between contracts — parent-child structures like MSAs and Order Forms, amendments, and conditional dependencies. Without this structural awareness, the repository ends up flattening nuance and obscuring how your contracts actually operate.
A good repository shouldn’t rely on your availability or willingness to commit time/effort. It should maintain quality in the background — adapting to change, keeping everything current, and eliminating the manual upkeep that usually creeps in over time.
Quality shouldn’t depend on your constant attention. A good repository takes full ownership of long-term maintenance, insulating you from risks like team changes, busy periods, or shifting priorities. Changes in your organisation shouldn’t impact your repository’s reliability. Instead, the solution should minimise or entirely remove the manual effort needed from your team to keep it accurate.
Your repository should always reflect each agreement’s current state — including renewals, amendments, terminations, and updated obligations or terms — without requiring manual data entry or intervention from your team.
A contract repository isn’t a one-time software purchase — it’s an ongoing commitment. The vendor should take ownership of the outcome, not just the interface. That means proactively doing everything necessary to make sure you have the best possible experience, rather than simply giving you the tools to get there yourself.
A contract repository should reduce cognitive load, not add to it. What matters should be obvious, what doesn’t should stay out of the way — and the system itself should help you find and manage what’s important.
Not every document deserves equal attention. Effective repositories actively filter out irrelevant drafts, duplicates, and outdated files, ensuring clarity and highlighting only the information that genuinely matters.
Clear labelling allows you to categorise your contracts, turning a potentially overwhelming set of contracts into an organised, intuitive system that’s tailored to your business context. After defining the labelling scheme once, your vendor should take care of applying it going forwards.
Your repository should give you precise control over who can access what, without becoming a configuration headache. Assigning permissions should be flexible enough to match your business needs, but simple enough that it doesn’t consume your time.
Finding information should never be a challenge. A good repository makes critical contract details instantly retrievable across your entire contract portfolio, freeing your team from tedious, manual searches.
Software only works if people actually use it. The best repositories eliminate friction at every stage — onboarding, adoption, integration, and support — so it becomes a tool people actually want to use, and not one they have to be reminded to.
Onboarding should require as little of your time as possible. That means handling the upload and organisation of your contracts for you, offering unlimited training and workshops, and guiding your team through every step of the transition without friction.
A contract repository should feel intuitive from day one. If getting value requires spending hours memorising complex workflows, the system is getting in the way. The best solutions make your contract data accessible without friction, so anyone can confidently use the repository.
Contract repositories should offer a flexible API that can slot effortlessly into your existing workflows and software providers, such as Salesforce. This isn’t just about pushing data into the repository; but also about being able to reliably pull structured, accurate data out as well.
A quality repository should come with responsive, in-house experts who understand your business, can hop on a call at short notice, and are equipped to handle requests with the same urgency and context-awareness as someone inside your company.
Your repository must grow and adapt effortlessly as your business evolves. A rigid solution that struggles to scale or adjust to new demands quickly becomes obsolete.
Growth shouldn't break your system. Whether you’re expanding into new markets, acquiring other companies, or onboarding more internal teams, your repository should be able to support increased contract volume and organisational complexity without disruption or compromising quality.
Business needs evolve — it’s extremely rare to know every single detail you need before the repository is in place. A good system should allow you to start small and bank value immediately, and then be able adapt over time to accommodate new requests, such as incorporating new data points, updating your taxonomy, or adding new labels.
A flexible repository doesn’t force you into a rigid, one-size-fits-all model with fixed data fields or predetermined schemas. Instead, it adapts to your workflows, captures the information that matters to you, and handles the real-world messiness of contracts — from low-quality scans and formatting quirks to inconsistent languages and flawed drafting.
You can’t build trust on moving foundations. If your repository treats each contract differently, you’ll never be sure how to interpret what you’re seeing. Consistency and standardisation gives you confidence that your data will always behave predictably.
Consistency starts with a tailored internal blueprint — a set of rules that defines exactly how your contracts should be handled. By encoding your business logic into repeatable, structured processes, a good repository ensures every contract is processed reliably and in line with your specific business context.
A robust, expert-defined data model captures the complexity of real-world contracts. Effective repositories rely on sophisticated schemas to handle edge cases and nuanced contractual data. Without the right data model underpinning it, even the most feature-rich solution will inevitably overpromise and underdeliver.
Quality comes down to repeatable processes. A strong repository enforces structured, standardised processes that guarantee consistent, reliable data capture across every single contract.
No chatbots. No offshored support. Just us. Whether you'd like a demo or have a question, simply get in touch and we'll get back to you today.
Book a demo