A common belief in contract management is that AI is faster, cheaper and more scalable than humans. The reality? The opposite is true.

AI hits a limit on accuracy and lacks the judgment needed to handle real-world complexity. Instead of delivering a fully managed contract repository, AI-first models create incomplete, unreliable databases that require constant manual correction.

That’s why Nomio combines AI with expert human oversight. AI handles the repetitive work, but only humans can ensure accuracy, resolve ambiguity, and manage the complexities that AI alone can’t. Having real people in the loop allows us to fully structure, maintain, and manage your database for you, so contract admin isn’t your problem anymore.

Why AI-only contract management fails

AI is a probability engine, not a contract specialist

AI doesn’t ‘read’ contracts the way a legal professional does. It doesn’t interpret meaning, verify facts or understand context when making a decision. Instead, it generates statistical predictions based on the data it’s been trained on.

This makes AI probabilistic, not deterministic. It doesn’t determine an answer with certainty — it estimates what the right answer might be. Every time AI captures a piece of contractual information, it’s making an educated guess, not a precisely reasoned decision.

For structured, predictable data, this approach works well. But when applied to contracts, where language is highly variable, context-dependent, and full of legal nuance, it quickly falls apart. Contract management demands absolute accuracy – every output must be correct. This is a level of precision that AI just can't deliver.

AI has an accuracy ceiling

Even state-of-the-art AI models have an upper accuracy limit, because contract interpretation isn’t just about pattern recognition. It requires legal reasoning, understanding of business context, and the ability to interpret how different clauses interact.

These models perform reasonably well for highly standardised, templated contracts. But as contracts become more complex, with more non-standard terms and negotiated provisions, AI’s reliance on training data starts to break down. These are exactly the contracts where accuracy matters most, as they tend to be the higher-value agreements where visibility over key clauses is already low.

AI's inability to these handle edge cases and nuances means that for the contracts where you need clarity the most, it provides the least reliable results.

90% accuracy isn’t good enough

A self-driving car that correctly interprets road markings 90% of the time sounds impressive — until you realise that one in ten journeys would end in a crash. The same applies to contract management.

Even if AI manages to capture 90% of the information in your contracts correctly, you’re left with a contract database where 10% of the data is wrong, incomplete, or misleading. When it comes to contracts, this simply isn’t good enough: even a single mistake can have serious consequences down the line.

AI pushes the manual work downstream

Beyond the direct risks that arise from AI making mistakes lies the secondary issue of trust. Once users start spotting errors, they stop trusting the data and start second-guessing everything. Instead of eliminating work, AI-first systems create more manual effort for users who have to double-check everything AI might have got wrong.

The problem is compounded by the fact that errors made by AI aren’t always immediately obvious. An incorrect renewal date might not cause issues until a critical deadline is missed, leading to an unintended contract extension or financial penalties. A misinterpreted payment obligation could go unnoticed for months, only to surface when a vendor suddenly demands outstanding fees.

By the time these mistakes are caught, the cost of fixing them is significantly higher than if they had been addressed upfront. This is the hidden flaw of AI-first solutions: they don’t eliminate the manual effort — they just delay it.

We use AI, but don’t depend on it

Involving humans in each step of our process doesn’t mean we’re anti-AI. We use it where it adds value, but we don’t rely on it. If AI tools were to fail or degrade in accuracy for whatever reason, we would still be able to perform 100% of the same job with our in-house team.

We ride the state-of-the-art in technology, just like our competitors. The difference is that we don’t gamble with the integrity of your contract data on unpredictable systems that are still evolving. AI supercharges our business model, but it doesn’t define it.

Humans scale better than AI

AI is often seen as infinitely scalable: process more data, automate more tasks, and eliminate the cost of paying people to do the work. But in contract management, AI gets less efficient as complexity increases. The more accuracy you need, the more expensive it becomes - yet it still never reaches 100% reliability. Humans, on the other hand, scale predictably, delivering accuracy without runaway costs.

AI efficiency drops off a cliff

AI models performs well for the first 60-70% of work, where extracting clear, structured data derived from common contract clauses is relatively straightforward. But beyond that point, each marginal improvement becomes exponentially harder and more expensive to achieve.

As soon as you introduce higher complexity, edge cases and non-standard contract terms, AI’s efficiency stalls. The model requires more compute power to handle these situations, yet the extra costs this incurs doesn’t reliably translate into accurate results.

AI can get you most of the way there quickly and cheaply, but it’s at that last stretch where it falls apart. The closer you push it towards perfect results, the less return you get on investment. Costs continue to rise, yet improvements become marginal until AI eventually hits a hard limit.

Integrating humans before AI’s failure point

Many AI-driven contract management systems introduce humans only as a last resort, stepping in to clean up after AI has made mistakes. By the time these errors are detected, they’ve already spread through the contract repository, making them harder and more expensive to correct.

Instead of waiting for AI to fail, Nomio integrates human expertise much earlier in our pipeline, ensuring accuracy before mistakes creep in. This means AI and human review run in parallel, not sequentially.

AI is used to accelerate processing, but humans are embedded from the start to validate outputs in real time, resolve ambiguities, and ensure contracts are structured correctly. This avoids cascading errors and ensures that your contract database is immediately reliable from day one.

Humans handle contract complexity more reliably

Unlike AI, which relies entirely on pre-trained data, our in-house team of Document Programmers are continuously building the capability to manage the complexities and nuances that AI often overlooks or misinterprets.

By virtue of reviewing thousands of pages worth of contracts each week, our team regularly comes across novel cases of contractual complexity. We dedicate an enormous amount of time into designing taxonomies and standardising internal processes to handle these edge cases, incorporating solutions into our approaches going forward.

Where AI is limited by the static nature of its training data, our team’s ability to interpret complex contracts and capture the data within them is grounded on a deep, constantly evolving knowledge base.

Humans handle contract complexity at lower cost

Human expertise also brings a clear cost advantage when it comes to contract complexity. Unlike AI, which becomes exponentially more expensive as you push for higher accuracy, human expertise scales predictably.

• AI costs skyrocket as complexity grows: AI improves quickly at first, but as complexity increases, AI requires more compute power. Further gains become significantly more costly while delivering marginal improvements.
• Humans provide consistent output as a fixed cost: The cost of human expertise doesn’t explode in the same way as complexity increases. Whilst a complex contract might require a little more time and attention, our team of humans already have the expertise to handle them – there’s no additional input cost needed to ‘unlock’ this capability.

This is why humans + AI scale better than AI alone. AI handles high-volume, low-complexity work, while humans focus on high-value, high-context tasks. This combination ensures that contract management scales efficiently, without runaway costs or unreliable results.

Document Programmers: the humans in the loop

An elite team of contract specialists

A common misconception about human involvement in contract management is that it means slow, manual review done by offshore workers performing rote data entry. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

Our Document Programmers are not back-office workers following a checklist — they are skilled professionals trained in contract analysis and data structuring.

Here’s what sets them apart:

• They are not offshored: We don’t outsource to low-cost labor markets. We only recruit top-tier talent through a rigorous hiring process, and build them a long-term career where we invest in their long-term development.
• They undergo intensive training: Before they ever touch real customer data, Document Programmers go through intensive training to develop expertise in interpreting contracts and information architecture.
• They work directly with customers: Our Document Programmers aren’t hidden behind the scenes — they are actively involved in onboarding, customer support, and repository refinement. They can jump on a call at a moment’s notice, answer questions, and adapt repositories as business needs evolve.
• They’re involved in every step of the process: Their role extends far beyond simply validating AI outputs. Document Programmers design your database schema, apply your business logic, resolve ambiguities, and build a structured, usable contract repository that AI alone could never create.

Simply put, our human experts don’t just check data — they transform it into something structured, reliable, and built for real-world use.

Document Programmers take the work off your plate

Building and maintaining a contract repository isn’t just about extracting data — it’s about structuring, organising, and continuously managing it so it remains accurate and usable over time. This is where AI-first solutions fall short, leaving legal and procurement teams with the tedious burden of setup and ongoing maintenance.

With Nomio, we handle all of this for you through involving humans in the process. Our Document Programmers take care of every aspect of setup and configuration, ensuring you never have to be responsible for filling in the gaps that an AI system has left. This involves:

• Organising your contracts: We ensure every agreement is properly categorised and stored in a way that makes retrieval effortless. MSAs, Statements of Work, amendments, and Order Forms are all grouped correctly, so you never waste time searching for related documents.
• Naming everything consistently: We apply clear, logical naming structures to every document so you always know exactly what you’re looking at.
• Applying the correct labels: Contracts don’t just need to be stored — they need to be classified in a way that makes sense for your business. We work with you to create a labelling convention, and then apply this to every one of your contracts for you based on your instructions.
• Setting up access controls and permissions: Not every contract should be visible to everyone. We configure role-based access and security permissions, ensuring the right teams have visibility while sensitive agreements remain protected.
• Designing your database schema: AI can extract data points, but it doesn’t create the underlying structure that makes them useful. Our team defines the schema for your contract repository, ensuring key data points are structured properly for reporting, compliance, and automation.
• Accommodating and making changes: As your business evolves, so do your contract management needs. We don’t just set up your repository and leave; you can request changes, refinements, and updates at any time, and our team will handle them for you.
• Flagging errors and inconsistencies: Contracts often contain conflicting terms, missing clauses, and ambiguities that AI alone won’t catch. Our Document Programmers proactively identify these issues, flag them for review, and ensure they are resolved, so you can trust that your repository reflects the most accurate version of every agreement.

With Nomio, you don’t just get a half-finished system — you get a fully managed repository that requires zero manual effort on your end.

The theoretically perfect contract repository

Our goal is simple: take our customers from zero to a perfect contract repository for as little cost as possible — so we can charge them as little as possible. But achieving this comes with two non-negotiable parameters:

1. The repository has to be perfect — every contract has to be accurate, complete, structured, and instantly accessible. No missing documents, no mislabeled files, no creeping errors.
2. We do all the work — because if even a fraction of the effort is pushed back onto the customer, it’s not truly a managed solution.

But none of our customers have ever started with a clear vision of what their perfect contract repository actually looks like. AI doesn’t solve this problem — even if it could extract data flawlessly (which it can’t), it wouldn’t understand how to build a database that actually works for your business and evolves as your needs change.

That’s where our humans come in. They actively help shape your repository, working with you to understand your contracts, business context, and the information that actually matters. If AI alone could create the perfect contract repository from the ground up, we wouldn’t have invested into building a team of highly trained experts. But we know from experience: the only way to build the perfect contract database is through the right combination of AI and human expertise.

That’s why our Document Programmers are the rock-solid layer of consistency in your contract management process, no matter how much work is on your plate. Without humans, you don’t get a contract repository — you get a mess you still have to fix.

‍